Leadership and power Essay

We have described power as the capacity to cause revision and influence as the degree of actual change in a targets ports. Ho Chings power as a leader has been recognized by many, but would you describe Ho Ching as an influential leader? Why? Yes Ho Ching would be an influential leader because she has the capabilities to persuade others to companion her lead2.Based on the excerpt from Ho Chings speech, what type of tactics does she use to influence the behavior of others? Ho Ching use coercive power to direct her followers3. Ho Ching has been named one of the most effective leaders in Asia. What are her major sources of power? Her major resource of power came mainly on her connections mostly her husbandReview the Leader Motives in Ch. 5 of lead Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. How would you characterize Ho Chings motives? Her motives were to build a better relationship with India and help Singapore grow.Review Highlight 5.3 in Leadership Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. What role, if any, do managerial differences based on gender play here? There are managerial differences based on gender Females tend to act with the organizations broad interests in try mind, consider how others felt about the influence, involve others in planning, and think on both the task and social aspects of the situation. Male managers, on the other hand, were more likely to act out of self-interest, show less(prenominal) context for how others might feel about the influence attempt, work alone in developing their strategy, and focus originally on the task alone.Malemanagers, on the other hand, were more likely to act out of self-interest, show less consideration for how others might feel about the influence attempt, work alone in developing their strategy, and focus primarily on the task alone. Female managers were less likely than male managers to compromise or transact during their influence attempts. The female managers were actually more likely to persist in trying to persuade their superiors, even so to the point of open opposition. Although their managerial styles were different neither group was more effective than the other.